| Hot: |
The Tera Report released in March this year, (“Building a Digital Economy: The Importance of Saving Jobs in the EU’s Creative Industries”) prepared by TERA Consultants and supervised by Patrice Geoffron, Professor of Economics at Paris-Dauphine University, as the director of the study; made a number of claims about file sharing, and resulting job loss based on a series of assumptions.
This is our third Rebuttal Response with Rebuttal 1 and 3 already published [please see references].
The Tera report proved that by selecting an old data set (NACE 1.1 no longer in use by EU statisticians since 1 January 2008) that there is Piracy in Europe and that Piracy will cause massive job losses over the next decade.
In other words, the report didn’t include any of the growth statistics of the fastest growing media segments:
- Computer and console games
- 3D Graphics content creation
- Video on Demand
- Telecommunications infrastructure
- Mobile phone take-up and applications
- Social Network Web Tools and applications.
The Tera Report presented a series of facts that might be considered misleading by anyone that understands technology or even that the world of media is undergoing a metamorphous from the old physical to the new digital.
We have a number of concerns about the dataset chosen and used by Tera to deliver this report.
Today, we thought we would give you a peek into how Tera consultants managed to use the Eurostat system to suit their own agenda.
We were going to conduct this response to the Tera report on Job Loss in the EU as a result of File Sharing in a structured fashion. Unfortunately, tying all the pieces together so that they are suitable for a Blog article is actually much harder to do than when you have the luxury of endless page capacity in a word processor with Tables of Authorities and cross referencing tools with footnotes.
(…. AND, I’m just one guy with masses of data to present in this most unusual of formats…. html. Perhaps I should print it in a newspaper…..)
So today we will analyse just one item of data offered by Trra as a justification for claiming piracy causes jobs to be lost.
NACE DL323 has many products – however in our opinion reads more like the asset register from the Museum displaying technology from yesteryear than the list of products that should be included in a fair comparison of job loss causational factors.
(We have highlighted what we consider the sunset industries in the following list.)
|
32301155 |
Radio receivers, portable, sound recording or reproducing |
|
32301159 |
Radio receivers, portable, n.e.c. |
|
32301175 |
Radio receivers, with sound recording or reproducing |
|
32301177 |
Other radio receivers not combined with sound recording or |
|
32301179 |
Radio receivers, n.e.c. |
|
32301270 |
Radio receivers motor vehicles with sound recording or |
|
32301290 |
Radio receivers for motor vehicles, n.e.c. |
|
32302020 |
Colour television projection equipment and videoprojectors |
|
32302030 |
Colour televisions with a video recorder or player |
|
32302045 |
Colour video monitors with cathode-ray tube |
|
32302049 |
Flat panel video monitor, LCD or plasma, etc., without |
|
32302050 |
Colour television receivers with integral tube (excluding |
|
32302060 |
Flat panel colour TV receivers, lcd/plasma, etc. excluding |
|
32302075 |
Tuner blocks for CTV/VCR and cable TV receiver units |
|
32302079 |
Satellite TV Receiver/Decoder (colour television |
|
32302083 |
Black and white or other monochrome video monitors |
|
32302085 |
Black and white or other monochrome television receivers |
|
32303135 |
Jukeboxes and the like (coin or disc-operated |
|
32303139 |
Record-players and turntables (record decks) (excluding |
|
32303150 |
Transcribing machines |
|
32303175 |
Cassette players (including telephone answering machines |
|
32303179 |
CD players, mains/personal (excluding combined with radio/ |
|
32303230 |
Dictating machines operated by an external source of power |
|
32303250 |
Telephone answering machines with sound recording |
|
32303275 |
Cassette recorders (cassette player/recorders) (including |
|
32303279 |
Other tape recorders (magnetic tape player/recorders) |
|
32303290 |
Sound recording apparatus (including digital disc audio |
|
32303335 |
Electronic still cameras and video camcorders; digital |
|
32303339 |
Video cassette recorders for magnetic tape of width |
|
32303350 |
Other video tape recorders excluding those combined with a |
|
32303370 |
Video recorders or player/recorders (including laser or |
|
32304100 |
Microphones and their stands (excluding cordless |
|
32304235 |
Single loudspeakers mounted in their enclosures (including |
|
32304237 |
Multiple loudspeakers mounted in the same enclosure |
|
32304239 |
Loudspeakers (including speaker drive units, frames or |
|
32304270 |
Headphones and earphones, even with microphone, and sets |
|
32304355 |
Telephonic and measurement amplifiers (excluding high or |
|
32304359 |
Audio-frequency electric amplifiers (including hi-fi |
|
32304370 |
Electric sound amplifier sets (including public address |
|
32304450 |
Portable receivers for calling or paging |
|
32304490 |
Radio-telephony or radio-telegraphy reception apparatus |
|
32305130 |
Pick-up cartridges for discs or mechanically recorded |
|
32305150 |
Precious or semi-precious stones for styli |
|
32305170 |
Other parts and accessories of 8519, 8520, 8521 |
|
32305180 |
Parts of apparatus of 8518 |
|
32305220 |
Telescopic and whip-type aerials for portable apparatus or |
|
32305235 |
Outside aerials for radio or television reception via |
|
32305239 |
Outside aerials for radio or television reception |
|
32305250 |
Inside aerials for radio or television reception |
|
32305270 |
Other aerials and parts |
|
32305280 |
Parts of apparatus of 8525, 8526, 8527, 8528 |
|
32309100 |
Installation services of professional radio, television, |
|
32309200 |
Repair and maintenance services of professional radio, |
We could take up several pages in analyzing each segment, but will restrict ourselves to one by way if example.:
|
2303135 |
Jukeboxes and the like (coin or disc-operated |
Juke boxes were big business … circa 1950. On page 164 From Tyler Cowen’s “In praise of commercial culture” we learn that:
The Rise of the Jukebox
The greater diversity offered by records compared to radio provided many avenues for the propagation of new music. The jukebox broughtotherwise neglected records to a large public audience.
The marketing of the electronically-amplified jukebox: in 1927 initiated the heyday of this medium. Suddenly the jukebox could beused to entertain large groups of people in dance halls, bars, and clubs.
By 1939 approximately 300.000 jukeboxes were installed, with 30 millionrecords produced for jukebox use each year. By the middle of the1940s. jukeboxes absorbed three-quarters of the records produced in America.
And an update on the state of the industry from an article in the Sarasota Herald-Tribune – dated July 8, 1982.
The Jukebox manufacturing business is also in decline. In the early 1970s, the association says four U.S. manufacturers – Wurlitzer, Seeberg, Rockola and Rowe – produced 70,000 jukeboxes a year.
Wurlitzer stopped making jukeboxes in 1974. Seeburg went bankrupt five years later and was purchased by Stern Electronics which is now marketing boxes under the Seeburg name. The
total domestic jukebox output is down to 25,000 a year, and half of those are sold abroad.
So the question remains, who purchases Jukeboxes and why?
It is our opinion from examining the websites of several Jukebox manufacturers and restorer firms that the Jukebox industry today mainly has wealthier individuals that wish to have a reminder of their youth, whether for home use and display in the entertainment room, or in a growing niche market, the themed bar or saloon.
Obviously, the EU stats show this lowered manufacturing capacity referred to in the above newspaper article.
|
|
|
Value EU-15 Total Sales (€) |
Base EU-15 |
Germany |
Spain |
France |
Italy |
The United Kingdom |
|
2001 |
32303135 |
19799 |
|
:C |
0 |
0 |
0 |
:C |
|
2002 |
32303135 |
16780 |
|
:C |
0 |
0 |
0 |
:C |
|
2003 |
32303135 |
21000 |
7000 |
:C |
0 |
0 |
2401 |
:C |
|
2004 |
32303135 |
16000 |
4000 |
:C |
0 |
0 |
3933 |
:C |
|
2005 |
32303135 |
12000 |
6000 |
:C |
0 |
0 |
897 |
:C |
|
2006 |
32303135 |
20000 |
5000 |
:C |
0 |
0 |
1465 |
:C |
|
2007 |
32303135 |
24000 |
8000 |
:C |
0 |
0 |
1085 |
:C |
|
2008 |
32303135 |
No Data Available |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
N.B. Please note the dip in production and sales from 2003-2005. (Undoubtedly due to piracy.)
The yellow section on each column refers to Italy only. It is assumed that the rest are manufactured in the UK.
Possibly the authors of the Tera report are from a different generation than that which comprises the majority of the current and future customer base of what constitutes media today.
Their lack of recognition of the immediacy and digital nature of media content by today’s consumers has led them to create a report based on incorrect assumptions and consequently arrive at obviously incorrect conclusions.
Australian researcher, Sharn Donnison interviewed 70 young teachers to determine what constituted the digital generation and how best to “teach” them. ( The “Digital Generation”, Technology, and Educational Change Griffith University)
The “Digital Generation”
… is about young adults and their relationship to information and communication technologies (ICTs).
… There is some disparity on the age parameters for the “Digital Generation”.
Consequently, their estimated numbers differ. However, what is undisputed is that they are prolific (Shepherdson, 2000). Their numbers are estimated to be larger than their “Baby Boomer” parents and will thus constitute the next “great” generation in the history of Western civilisation (Strauss & Howe, 1997).
This generation is often defined by their relationship to technology. While they have numerous descriptors such as the “Echo Boomers”, “NeXters”, “Bittersweet Generation”, “Millennials”,
and “Generation Y2K” they are most commonly referred to as the “Digital Generation”, “e-generation”, “Generation Dotcom”, “Cyber Generation”, and the “Net Generation”(Websters Online Dictionary, 2004). Much has been written about this generation often with a view to determining marketing strategies and future strategic goal setting. Some authors (Little, 2000; Mackay, 1997) have written about them simply with a view to understanding their cultural characteristics and motivations.
Inevitably, in any description, authors will note their intimate relationship to ICTs. For instance Gaylor (2002) argues that they are the first generation who has been weaned on computers and who have not only embraced technology but actually celebrate it.
The “Digital Generation’s” propensity towards ICTs is not disputed. They have a particular affinity for the Internet and use it for a multitude of purposes. This generation find it indispensable for
entertainment, shopping on line, homework and studies, banking, paying bills, communicating with peers, and developing community.
Furthermore, it is employed by members of this generation at a very basic level to craft their personalities. Mcgregor (2001) and Shepherson (2000) note how the “Digital Generation” use technologies to create unique and pastiched identities that are cut and pasted from cultural and
historical sources.
Undoubtedly, the “Digital Generation’s”character has been partially informed by their proclivity towards ICTs. Gaylor (2002) says of them that them that they are technosavvy, image driven, develop graphicy skills before literacy skills, do not think in a linear fashion but rather think non-linear, loopy, in hyperlink, hopscotch fashion. Time, for them, is measured in microseconds, and
survival is of the fastest not the fittest. They have a strong sense of immediacy, a desire for instant gratification, and a low boredom threshold.
They are success oriented and believe change can occur overnight in an “anything can happen and probably will world”. They learn by interaction and doing rather than sitting and listening and prefer to experience and feel rather than think and analyse.
Conclusion.
We find the study is heavily biased by the drop in sales from sunset manufacturing industries and by the omission of Video Games, Video on Demand and Mobile software delivery and manufacturing indices has ensured that the results are heavily skewed in a negative fashion.
We are disappointed that an eminent academic and respected member of ther community could get the facts, quite so wrong.
References:
Cowen, Tyler (2000). In praise of commercial culture. Harvard University Press. pp. 164,166. ISBN 0674001885.
Arar Y (AAP 1981) The Sound of the Jukebox may soon be a distant memory.
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=r080AAAAIBAJ&sjid=L2gEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6793%2C3437935
Donnison S “The Digital Generation, Technology, and Educational Change” – Griffith University
http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/10072/2085/1/25836_1.pdf
Eurostat Database
‘Data’ / ‘Industry, trade and services’ / ‘Horizontal view’ / ‘Structural Business Statistics’
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home
Tera Rebuttal Response 1 – File Sharing – Convenience, Availability (March 30, 2010)
Tera Rebuttal Response 3 – The Accuracy of Data (March 31, 2010)

